AI Thời sự

[ốc]

Artificial Intolerance: Cô gái đồ giả

Amelia: the AI-generated British schoolgirl who is a far-right social media star
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ial-media-meme

Her name is Amelia, a purple-haired “goth girl” who proudly carries a mini union flag and appears to have a penchant for racism.



Videos of Amelia typically feature her walking through London, or the House of Commons, declaring her love for England and warning of the dangers of “militant Muslims” or “third-world migrants”. In one clip she is harangued by bearded man in Islamic attire for eating a pork sausage.

Users of X have turned to its Grok AI tool to create so many Amelia memes, she is now breaking out of niche online silos.

The origins of the character are ironic, to say they least. An early iteration of Amelia began life in a counter-extremism video game funded by the UK Home Office and created to deter young people aged 13-18 from being attracted to far right extremism in Yorkshire.

The volume of “Ameliaposting” has since gone from an average of 500 a day when that account first introduced it to the world to roughly 10,000, starting on 15 January as it hit international audiences. On Wednesday, it hit 11,137 posts on X alone.

In one of the most surreal twists, an Amelia cryptocurrency has emerged, with social media users seeking to leverage its value on the meme’s rising profile.

“What we’re seeing is the monetisation of hate,” said Matteo Bergamini, the founder and CEO of Shout Out UK, a political and media literacy training company that created the original game.

MAGA: Make AI Gross Again

[005]

Artificial Intolerance: Cô gái đồ giả

Amelia: the AI-generated British schoolgirl who is a far-right social media star
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ial-media-meme



MAGA: Make AI Gross Again

Cái "ổ" Mã Gà này đi quá xa. Ghê thật.

Tuy nhiên, ngày nay để phân biệt thị phi. Có lẽ chỉ cần dùng chiêu "Đẩu chuyển tinh di" của giòng họ Mộ Dung. Nghĩa là mang các tác phẩm ấy về lại nhà "chính chủ", cho chủ nhơn soi xét. Sẽ nghe được lời bàn.

Ví dụ thầy Ốc thử mang cái video clip này https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mc-plxSRBLI đưa cho chị Chê Mi Nai xem, chị ấy sẽ có lời bàn khá thẳng thắn.

[ốc]

Lương y như từ Youtube?

Google AI Overviews cite YouTube more than any medical site for health queries
https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...itations-study

Researchers at SE Ranking, a search engine optimisation platform, found YouTube made up 4.43% of all AI Overview citations. No hospital network, government health portal, medical association or academic institution came close to that number, they said.

“This matters because YouTube is not a medical publisher,” the researchers wrote. “It is a general-purpose video platform. Anyone can upload content there (eg board-certified physicians, hospital channels, but also wellness influencers, life coaches, and creators with no medical training at all).”

The SE Ranking study analysed 50,807 healthcare-related prompts and keywords to see which sources AI Overviews relied on when generating answers.

They chose Germany because its healthcare system is strictly regulated by a mix of German and EU directives, standards and safety regulations. “If AI systems rely heavily on non-medical or non-authoritative sources even in such an environment, it suggests the issue may extend beyond any single country,” they wrote.

AI Overviews surfaced on more than 82% of health searches, the researchers said. When they looked at which sources AI Overviews relied on most often for health-related answers, one result stood out immediately, they said. The single most cited domain was YouTube with 20,621 citations out of a total of 465,823.

A Google a day keeps the doctor away.

[005]

Lương y như từ Youtube?
A Google a day keeps the doctor away.

Vụ này chị nón ... nỉ rành nè.

[005]

Lương y như từ Youtube?

Google AI Overviews cite YouTube more than any medical site for health queries
https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...itations-study

A Google a day keeps the doctor away.

Thầy Ốc 10K làm google hắn sợ, hắn đục bỏ nhiều cái lang bầm lang vập rồi.

---

‘Dangerous and alarming’:
Google removes some of its AI summaries after users’ health put at risk

Google has removed some of its artificial intelligence health summaries after a Guardian investigation found people were being put at risk of harm by false and misleading information.

The company has said its AI Overviews, which use generative AI to provide snapshots of essential information about a topic or question, are “helpful” and “reliable”.

But some of the summaries, which appear at the top of search results, served up inaccurate health information, putting users at risk of harm.

In one case that experts described as “dangerous” and “alarming”, Google provided bogus information about crucial liver function tests that could leave people with serious liver disease wrongly thinking they were healthy.

Typing “what is the normal range for liver blood tests” served up masses of numbers, little context and no accounting for nationality, sex, ethnicity or age of patients, the Guardian found.

What Google’s AI Overviews said was normal may vary drastically from what was actually considered normal, experts said. The summaries could lead to seriously ill patients wrongly thinking they had a normal test result, and not bother to attend follow-up healthcare meetings.

After the investigation, the company has removed AI Overviews for the search terms “what is the normal range for liver blood tests” and “what is the normal range for liver function tests”.

A Google spokesperson said: “We do not comment on individual removals within Search. In cases where AI Overviews miss some context, we work to make broad improvements, and we also take action under our policies where appropriate.”

Vanessa Hebditch, the director of communications and policy at the British Liver Trust, a liver health charity, said: “This is excellent news, and we’re pleased to see the removal of the Google AI Overviews in these instances.

“However, if the question is asked in a different way, a potentially misleading AI Overview may still be given and we remain concerned other AI‑produced health information can be inaccurate and confusing.”

The Guardian found that typing slight variations of the original queries into Google, such as “lft reference range” or “lft test reference range”, prompted AI Overviews. That was a big worry, Hebditch said.

“A liver function test or LFT is a collection of different blood tests. Understanding the results and what to do next is complex and involves a lot more than comparing a set of numbers.

“But the AI Overviews present a list of tests in bold, making it very easy for readers to miss that these numbers might not even be the right ones for their test.

“In addition, the AI Overviews fail to warn that someone can get normal results for these tests when they have serious liver disease and need further medical care. This false reassurance could be very harmful.”

Google, which has a 91% share of the global search engine market, said it was reviewing the new examples provided to it by the Guardian.

Hebditch said: “Our bigger concern with all this is that it is nit-picking a single search result and Google can just shut off the AI Overviews for that but it’s not tackling the bigger issue of AI Overviews for health.”

Sue Farrington, the chair of the Patient Information Forum, which promotes evidence-based health information to patients, the public and healthcare professionals, welcomed the removal of the summaries but said she still had concerns.

“This is a good result but it is only the very first step in what is needed to maintain trust in Google’s health-related search results. There are still too many examples out there of Google AI Overviews giving people inaccurate health information.”

Millions of adults worldwide already struggle to access trusted health information, Farrington said. “That’s why it is so important that Google signposts people to robust, researched health information and offers of care from trusted health organisations.”

AI Overviews still pop up for other examples the Guardian originally highlighted to Google. They include summaries of information about cancer and mental health that experts described as “completely wrong” and “really dangerous”.

Asked why these AI Overviews had not also been removed, Google said they linked to well-known and reputable sources, and informed people when it was important to seek out expert advice.

A spokesperson said: “Our internal team of clinicians reviewed what’s been shared with us and found that in many instances, the information was not inaccurate and was also supported by high quality websites.”

Victor Tangermann, a senior editor at the technology website Futurism, said the results of the Guardian’s investigation showed Google had work to do “to ensure that its AI tool isn’t dispensing dangerous health misinformation”.

/*src.: https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...-investigation

[ốc]

Yếu huyệt của AI là cái gì cũng biết nhưng hông bao giờ nó biết nó sai. AI cũng vô minh như ai.

Tin này cũ nhưng còn thời sự:

US lawyer sanctioned after using ChatGPT for court brief
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ai-court-brief

Utah court of appeals made the decision to sanction Richard Bednar over claims that he filed a brief that included false citations.

It appears that at least some portions of the Petition may be AI-generated, including citations and even quotations to at least one case that does not appear to exist in any legal database (and could only be found in ChatGPT.

The brief referenced a case titled “Royer v. Nelson”, which did not exist in any legal database.

Lawyer caught using AI-generated false citations in court case in Australian
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025...stralian-first

A Victorian lawyer has become the first in Australia to face professional sanctions for using artificial intelligence in a court case, being stripped of his ability to practise as a principal lawyer after AI generated false citations that he had failed to verify.

When the matter returned to court the lawyer confirmed that the list had been prepared using legal software that utilised AI.

Since this case, there have been more than 20 other reported cases in Australian courts where lawyers or self-represented litigants have been found to have used artificial intelligence in the preparation of court documents that led to those documents containing fake citations.

US lawyers fined for submitting fake court citations from ChatGPT
https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...ations-chatgpt

The judge said the lawyers and their firm “abandoned their responsibilities when they submitted nonexistent judicial opinions with fake quotes and citations created by the artificial intelligence tool ChatGPT, then continued to stand by the fake opinions after judicial orders called their existence into question.”

Levidow, Levidow & Oberman said in a statement on Thursday that its lawyers “respectfully” disagreed with the court that they had acted in bad faith. “We made a good-faith mistake in failing to believe that a piece of technology could be making up cases out of whole cloth,” it said.

Mấy AI học được chữ ngờ…

[005]

We made a good-faith mistake in failing to believe that a piece of technology could be making up cases out of whole cloth

Ừa, con dao có thể cắt thịt nhưng cũng có thể giết người. Hôm nọ nghe Michelle Chiều bảo là ngồi Tesla cho nó tự lái luôn. Nói thật tự đáy lòng, khi nào 5 còn minh mẫn là vẫn còn lái xe, không giao tính mạng cho Elon Musk. hihihihi

[ốc]

Luật sư mà liều tin ChatGPT thì chắc cũng có mấy ông bác sĩ chữa bịnh theo Google AI.

Giao trứng cho AI.
(Tục ngữ)

[ốc]

không giao tính mạng cho Elon Musk

Nực cười robot lái xe
Tưởng nó rằng giỏi ai dè thua 5
(Car dao)

Thầy 5 chê Tesla quá làm anh Musk phải thí xe:

Musk pivots Tesla to robotics and AI as car business flails
https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...ates-elon-musk

The company’s Cybertruck, which Musk said earlier this month was “the best vehicle Tesla has ever made”, saw a drastic 48% decline in sales last year, according to Kelley Blue Book reports.

As Tesla’s vehicle sales have fallen over the past year, Musk and the company have emphasized a shift towards AI-driven projects such as Optimus consumer robots and self-driving Robotaxis. All of these technologies remain unproven and not widely available to the public, let alone profitable, but they have allowed Musk to claim the company will see unparalleled future growth without much to show for it today.

Musk has stated that Optimus would be the “biggest product of all time” and said that the robots, along with autonomous vehicles, would usher in “a world where there is no poverty”.

Tesla plans to start production of Optimus before the end of 2026, according to the earnings report. Musk has said the company will sell the robot to the public in 2027. Tesla also revealed that earlier this month it agreed to invest $2bn into xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence company.

“A world where there is no poverty” (Karl Musk) nghe giống lời hứa cuội của chủ nghĩa xã hội hồi nẳm.

[005]

Nực cười robot lái xe
Tưởng nó rằng giỏi ai dè thua 5
(Car dao)

Thầy 5 chê Tesla quá làm anh Musk phải thí xe:

Hông chê, chỉ muốn tự quyết định vận mệnh khi còn làm được thôi.

"Tránh (Tét)la không xấu mặt nào"

(Tự ngữ)